"Cognito ergo sum" - Latin for "I think; therefore, I am" |
I don't think your average person questions the very notion of reality, but I first pondered this notion after watching The Matrix (which is virtually a guarantee to be brought up in any intro philosophy class). This very questioning of reality also has implications with science since we generally will agree that something we observe is an undeniable fact. Science is really just a methodology of coming to the best explanation versus a pursuit of absolute truth. Regardless, there are at least three definitions of reality in the philosophical sense.
The first definition is perhaps the most inherent. Reality is composed of physical things, and we interact with those things whether we realize it or not. There is literally a keyboard that I am typing on, and there is literally a computer screen that you are reading this on. However, if you have seen The Matrix, you already know that this could be an illusion. If you haven't seen the movie, you may or may not know that everything you experience is simply electrical impulses interpreted by your brain. On a more rudimentary level, this text you're reading may be black, but in reality it is a combination of red, green, and blue pixels. I can go on and on about illusions and how easily your brain can be tricked, but surely, there has to be something that in front of you that is giving you information. You can put your finger up to the screen, and there is some force stopping you from moving it further.
This brings us to the second definition of reality. Reality is still composed of actual physical things, but our interpretation of what these things are entirely rests within our mind. Believe it or not this is where science actually operates. As I described in the last paragraph, the text you're reading is actually a combination of red, green, and blue pixels. If you had a really good magnifying glass, then you could actually see the truth of this. Now obviously science uses our senses, but it more often relies on instruments especially for precision. A simple example would be dropping two marbles from the same height and seeing if their own gravity would effect each other. To the naked eye there would be no change, but with a really precise measuring instrument they would have moved closer to each other ever so slightly. Now some may think I was being over clever and that this definition is truly what they mean; however, how do you know you are not in a dream right now or -using The Matrix example again- not in a simulation?
The final definition of reality is called Idealism. It basically says that everything we interact with is
Is your mind blown yet? |