"But a man is not really convinced of a philosophic theory when he finds that something proves it. He is only really convinced when he finds that everything proves it. And the more converging reasons he finds pointing to this conviction, the more bewildered he is if asked suddenly to sum them up. Thus, if one asked an ordinary intelligent man, on the spur of the moment, 'Why do you prefer civilization to savagery?' he would look wildly round at object after object, and would only be able to answer vaguely, 'Why, there is that bookcase... and the coals in the coal-scuttle... and pianos... and policemen.' The whole case for civilization is that the case for it is complex. It has done so many things. But that very multiplicity of proof which ought to make reply overwhelming makes reply impossible." ~ Orthodoxy, "The Paradoxes of Christianity."
This is not a compelling argument, but the quote beautifully captures the frustration that a believer has when trying to explain his faith with a nonbeliever. After deeply analyzing my own beliefs, even I have to accept that my belief in God rests entirely on faith. I will give some reasons why God is more credible than say unicorns, but just like with reality there is a seemingly compelling force that convinces me that God exists.
The Uncaused Cause
To me this is probably the most compelling reason for belief in the existence of God. The argument is as follows:
- Whatever begins to exist has a cause.
- The Universe began to exist.
- Therefore, the Universe had a cause.
Thanks to the popular television show. Pictures like these are harder to come by. |
Life
This would be at best considered an a posteriori argument, but the existence of life - especially solely existing on Earth- is probably the strongest reason I believe in God from a pure logical perspective. Life is truly an extraordinary miracle that occurs in nature. So extraordinary that it is just hard for me to believe in abiogenesis which is the hypothesis that life sprang from non-life. Definitely more an emotional argument than a logical argument, but I think even nonbelievers can appreciate this. What I think gives the intelligent design notion (purposely avoided the term theory) is that we can't find life any where else in the universe. We have microbes on this planet that can survive the most inhospitable conditions, yet we can't even find a single microbe in the cosmos. While this is falsifiable, it still doesn't prove anything, but again, I consider it a strong implication.
The Soul
Belief in an afterlife may also compel belief in a god. |
Now why this is important to the topic at large is that if a soul does exist, then what does it comprise of? If we are more than the sum of our parts, then that would imply that the soul is not physical which would be it's very definition mean that it is something supernatural. Going back to the uncaused cause argument, something supernatural has to come from somewhere and there is only one conclusion - God.
Despite all of these points ...
Like with reality, there is a compelling force that compels me to believe in God and ultimately Jesus that transcends logic. In the Lutheran tradition, I would call this force the Holy Spirit. While I have made some non-biblical reasons as to why I believe in God, I still think this force is what ultimately compels me to believe. With that said, I still think my reasons are better reasons than simply saying, "The Bible says so" when asked why you believe in God because it begs the question for the only reason you would believe in the Bible is because it is God's Word. Definitely a critique of Sunday School, and ultimately the reason why so many people lose their faith when confronted with this obvious error in logic. Even faith still needs to have a reason behind it even if you cannot fully determine its truth.